|
|
Volume 5, No. 2,
August 2006 |
Back |
Shall One Invest in Cancelled
Targets after the Termination of
Mergers and Acquisitions? |
|
|
Gene C.
Lai |
|
Department of
Finance, Insurance, and Real Estate, Washington State University,
U.S.A. |
Keith M.
Moore |
|
The Peter J. Tobin
College of Business, St. John's University, U.S.A. |
Henry R.
Oppenheimer |
|
College of
Business Administration, University of Rhode Island, U.S.A. |
|
|
Abstract |
|
|
|
Many portfolio
managers on Wall Street believe that investing in cancelled
targets after the termination of mergers and acquisitions is a
profitable strategy because arbitrageurs usually unwind their
position after the cancellation announcement. While the
anecdotal evidence shows that arbitrageurs do hold large
positions in target companies when the deals are cancelled, we
do not find that investing in cancelled targets is a profitable
strategy. Our results also suggest that, in general, there is no
relation between trading volume and abnormal returns. The
overall evidence indicates that the target stocks are
efficiently priced, and arbitrageurs unwinding their positions
does not provide an opportunity for abnormal returns. |
|
|
Key words:
merger
arbitrage; risk arbitrage; cancelled transactions; |
terminated takeovers |
JEL
classification:
G34; G14; G11 |
|
|
Back |
|