|
|
| Volume 2,
No. 3,
December
2003 |
Back |
|
Entry Deterrence under Agency Constraints |
|
|
|
Neelam Jain |
|
|
Department of Economics, Northern Illinois University, U.S.A. |
|
Thomas D. Jeitschko |
|
|
Department of Economics, Michigan State University, U.S.A. |
|
|
|
Leonard J. Mirman |
|
Department of Economics,
University of Virginia,
U.S.A. |
| |
|
Abstract |
|
We study models of signaling and entry deterrence when the
incumbent firm is subject to agency restraints and the principal
does not have the relevant information to signal to the potential
entrant. The informational implications of the dynamic agency
relationship are fully identified. A characterization of optimal
contracts is given for both the case of deterministic markets as
well as stochastic markets. Moreover, the differences between
whether incentive contracts are observable or hidden are
presented.
We find that one would expect that the study of agency and entry
is relevant in many markets, as agency makes entry more lucrative
and principals may have reasons to invite entry to alleviate
agency costs. We also propose empirically testable hypotheses that
are based on the insights of this paper. This study suggests that
entry deterrence is more likely to occur in less volatile markets.
Also, entry deterrence is found to be more effective when
incentives can credibly be made public. |
|
|
|
|
Key words: entry
deterrence; agency; financial intermediation; licensing;
divisionalization
|
| JEL
classification:
C73;
D8;
L1 |
|
|
|